Are we so arrived at port The answer is no

In the period of crisis through criticism and personal attacks are useless. It is the responsibility of the Government, which is to obtain results. And there is that of the UMP is to deal with all subjects which may be of interest to our fellow citizens. But whatever the theme that is considered, that our respective positions, it is essential to have each time the words peace and staging. We, responsible political, we are not here to tear, but for sewing and stitching. Without stigmatising. Fostering dialogue. Many French cannot even more talk. Need to find the path of dialogue and bring down the walls that stand today in France. That is why we have an interest and a moral obligation to maintain the unity of our family policy.

Stop using words that hurt. If committed in this way, we did never go far enough. The Republic now has words of peace. It's like this that we will find solutions to the problems of the French. The cantonal elections have shown that there is a popular anger in our country. Following the economic crisis very serious that we have crossed, our compatriots suffer, are faced with unemployment and the sense of having no prospects, especially in the rural communes. It is this social anger that the majority must go priority. That the FN, with often unknown candidates, can still win 10-15 of the vote in the Entre-Deux-tours in duel with the PS as with UMP seems to me extremely worrying.

Three responses, which are in complete reverse of what can propose the national Front. First, work tirelessly, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at the service of the French. We convince that in obtaining results. It must be that it is rolls up sleeves. Me first. We have managed to improve the situation of farmers, which was disastrous in 2009, but the account is not. They must still fight to improve the income of farmers, to fight for the countryside. Then, show that the France still has a destiny, to live the considerable strengths to succeed in all areas. Rather than take the defeatist speech of the national Front, show that the France can succeed in the world as it is, without a usage us on ourselves. Finally, we must insist on the fact that Europe is an asset for the France. Not the Europe that is competitive and gets lost in infighting. But Europe which defends its values and interests of its citizens, as during the French Presidency.

Must do better still. The President of the Republic has taken the right decisions in an extraordinarily serious situation. He is to have managed to avoid the worst and have started up the slope. Are we so arrived at port The answer is no. But we'll get there, I am satisfied.

Yes. It is best placed and it is the natural candidate of our political family. Because it is the outgoing Chairman. Because it provided evidence in difficult times that he was able to take the bar. As outgoing President, is only the legitimacy to lead our political family. All the rest, plans on Comet and the serious situation facing the France, the plans on the Comet are useless. It is better to a credible road map.

I am convinced that the interests of our family is in the gathering, not in the divisions. The condition of the rally, is embracing the diversity of ideas in our political family. Jean-Louis Borloo and Dominique de Villepin ideas must undoubtedly receive more attentive. A political family reduced to too narrow beliefs is a family that does not meet the diversity of the problems that have a face. An example: the centre suggested a proposal for a comprehensive law on the reduction of burdens on the ongoing work in agriculture, believing that we would not go far enough. What should we do Their slamming the door in the face or listen to what they have to tell us in considering that this can be interesting I think the second solution. Must listen to and respect. This requires concrete action.

We move from questions of political strategy to substantive strategies. I do not see the interest of focus us on the national Front, with no idea, no value is negotiable with the UMP. I will always refuse any rapprochement with the FN. We must not look what said the FN, often simplistic and wounding, but work to alleviate the suffering of the French. And we will more easily find solutions by working together that we divided.

Yes. And at the same time, I have beliefs I want to defend with the most force possible.